By Ali Al-Rumaih, The-14
May 15, 2024
McGill University’s attempt to urgently remove the Gaza Solidarity Encampment from its front lawn in downtown Montreal, QC, Canada through legal means has been rejected for the second time by Quebec courts. This setback comes after McGill’s initial injunction request was also dismissed, marking a significant development in the ongoing dispute.
The recent Quebec Court ruling, delivered by Quebec Superior Court Justice Marc St-Pierre, cited several factors for denying McGill’s request.
Firstly, McGill failed to provide evidence of violent incidents associated with the encampment since it was established on April 27, 2024. Additionally, the university’s claim of urgency, particularly in relation to convocation ceremonies, was called into question as McGill had already allocated funds to relocate the event to an alternate venue.
Moreover, McGill’s approach in naming the defendants as John Doe and Jane Doe instead of specific individuals was deemed insufficient by the courts, prompting a request for modifications to the application.
In his six-page decision, Judge Marc St-Pierre noted that the demonstrators are “part of a North American movement present in a few dozen universities in the United States in connection with the current events in the Gaza Strip where tens of thousands Palestinians have died, injured or dispossessed by the Israeli army.”
In response to the decision, McGill expressed agreement with the court’s previous assessment that the encampment is unlawful but expressed disappointment in the latest ruling. The university’s media relations team stated that they are analyzing the judgment to determine their next steps.
The rejection of McGill’s injunction request represents a significant victory for the pro-Palestinian demonstrators, who have been advocating for their right to peaceful protest. The encampment, established in solidarity with Gaza, has been described as a symbol of resistance against ongoing violence and occupation in Palestine.
The decision underscores the importance of protecting the right to peaceful protest on university campuses and sets a precedent for similar movements across North America. Despite McGill’s efforts to remove the encampment, the court’s ruling reaffirms the demonstrators’ right to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly.
Upon learning of the judge’s decision, the atmosphere at the encampment was filled with cheers and applause. Demonstrators were heard chanting, “The people united will never be defeated,” reflecting their solidarity and determination in their cause.
The protesters have stated that they will continue in the encampment until McGill University takes action to divest from companies with ties to Israel and severs connections with Israeli academic institutions.
They argue that McGill’s investments are linked to companies involved in supporting Israel’s war against Hamas. These companies include Lockheed Martin, Thales SA, and Safran, which are all defense contractors and have received investments from McGill totaling millions of dollars.
This demand aligns with calls from student unions at various universities across North America for divestment from companies associated with Israel’s policies in the region.
Moving forward, McGill will need to reassess its approach to the situation and consider alternative means of addressing the concerns raised by the encampment protesters. The ongoing dialogue between the university administration and the demonstrators will likely continue as both parties seek to find a resolution that respects the rights and perspectives of all involved.
Subscribe to our newsletter.