Peter R. Thompson, Simon Fraser University
April 19, 2026
British Columbia’s wildlife is in trouble, and governments aren’t working hard enough to keep wild animals and plants alive. How do we know?
Fortunately, the provincial government has long kept extensive records of the animals and plant life that call its lands and waters home. The BC Conservation Data Centre (CDC) holds records for over 25,000 species, ranging from mosses to mackerel and mountain goats.
The status of each species is assessed by scientists to determine the risk that a species will go extinct or be extirpated from the province.
The results of these fine-grained status assessments help divide all of B.C.’s wildlife into one of three lists representing their level of endangerment: “Red” for critically imperilled species, “Blue” for species of special concern and “Yellow” for secure species that are currently at low extinction risk.
The problem is that neither species status assessments nor the colour-coded lists have any legal implications. Even if a species is known to be at high risk of extinction, it’s not guaranteed any protection from the B.C. government.
Colleagues and I used this data to find out how B.C.’s wildlife has been faring under such an uncertain legal landscape. Our recently published study analyzed changes in the province’s conservation database over time. We also explored the nature of these changes.
Genuine vs. non-genuine status changes
As of 2025, B.C. was home to 493 red-listed species and 1,233 blue-listed species — a 25 per cent increase from 2008. However, that increase was largely due to the addition of species, rather than species shifting categories.
Sometimes, the status assessment of a species improves due to the discovery of new information, such as a new population of the species in B.C. that presumably always existed, but was previously unknown.
These changes are still good news — a sign that continuously monitoring wildlife in B.C. is paying dividends — but they don’t actually represent an improvement in the species’ true status on the ground.
Using the comments provided with each listing change, we separated these “non-genuine” status changes from the “genuine” status changes that actually reflected shifts in population size, range size within the province or the intensity of threats.
The data show that almost all of B.C.’s endangered wildlife are not recovering quickly enough, if at all. Out of the thousands of species in the CDC database, of which hundreds are red- or blue-listed, only 14 moved down the ranks of endangerment (from red to blue, or blue to yellow) between 2008 and 2025 for genuine reasons.
That means that every other species is either inching even closer to the brink of extinction than they previously were, or has simply stayed at the same risk level. The latter situation was much, much more common, with only 18 per cent of species exhibiting any sort of change at all.
We found that the vast majority of these changes were non-genuine, arising from the discovery of additional populations, changes to assessment criteria or taxonomic “lumps” and “splits” that changed the definition of what constitutes a species.
These results point to an undeniable fact: if a species was on the red list in 2008, a category reserved for species in desperate need of our help, it is probably still there today.
Jump-starting endangered species recovery
Mechanisms for protecting endangered wildlife do exist, but they leave significant gaps in the system. For example, B.C.’s Wildlife Act only affords protection to four species, and Canada’s Species at Risk Act only applies to federal land, which only covers one per cent of B.C.
One solution to the problems facing many red- and blue-listed species in B.C. is to expand provincial species-at-risk legislation to species and areas that are not currently protected.
New laws could fill gaps left by the federal Species at Risk Act and B.C.’s Wildlife Act by applying similar provisions against harming endangered wildlife or destroying their habitat. This solution would provide species an important safety net against resource extraction and habitat destruction in the province.
The longer the B.C. government waits to implement these changes, the more likely that red-listed species will disappear from the province permanently. With them, the province will lose a part of what makes it beautiful and a part of the natural beauty that has made it Canada’s most biodiverse province.
Even a few simple legal actions at the provincial level would go a long way towards keeping endangered species alive and enriching local ecosystems for future generations.
Peter R. Thompson, Postdoctoral Fellow, School of Environmental Science, Simon Fraser University
Subscribe to our newsletter.
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
